A Zero Carbon Society
Thursday, 26 February 2015
6 – 8:30pm
registration starts at 5:30pm
Sallis Benney Theatre, Grand Parade, University of Brighton
Introductions and keynote speech will be made by Caroline Lucas, MP for Brighton Pavilion
Come watch the presentation and Q&A by Paul Allen, contributing author to the Zero Carbon Britain report, the Centre for Alternative Technology’s (CAT) flagship project that details how a modern, zero emissions society is possible using technologies that are available today.
Roundtable discussions will be lead by local experts in the field of Transport, Energy, Housing and Food from the Food Partnership, the Science Policy Research Unit from the University of Sussex, C Change sustainability group from the University of Brighton and the Bike Train.
The discussions will be followed by networking with drinks and nibbles to fuel your discussions. This is a great opportunity to meet and speak to people who are on the frontlines of the transition to a zero carbon society. Create links and share best practice with the local community during this inspiring event. Book your place for free to avoid disappointment.
With the fossil fuel industry up to capacity, the government has ignored the obvious alternative and decided to hand out tax breaks for dirty gas, oil and nuclear power, despite overwhelming scientific and economic evidence of the benefits of renewable alternatives.
So, the air gets more polluted and unnecessarily cold homes continue to contribute to the misery and deaths of thousands of vulnerable people each winter.
We have the resources and the research, and most significantly the will to overcome the energy challenges we face in the UK. Within the space of a year 15 community groups in Sussex alone have joined forces to support energy savings and the development of locally generated renewable energy. But those in power are sidestepping the obvious solution diverting taxpayers funds to uneconomic investments.
Instead, the government offers tax breaks for the big energy companies to build more fossil fuel plants and new nuclear. The autumn statement promised £15billion for roads. It overhauls stamp duty ignoring the opportunity to link it to environmentally friendly buildings. Even the flood defense proposals are inadequate, according to experts. The treasury continues to endorse shale gas production, despite overwhelming public concern about safety and the impacts on land, water and air, including the emission of even more greenhouse gases.
As taxpayers we are right to have a say in where our money goes, and insist on value for money on government spending. One may ask how this major investment in roads and tax breaks for fossil fuels will meet the immediate need to address fuel poverty and its consequent pressure on the NHS. Furthermore, how will it encourage the generation of locally controlled renewable energy which has been proven to reduce energy prices in Germany and is supported by millions of people across the country as a way of taking back control of our own energy supply and improving energy security?
09 Apr 2014
The long awaited announcement came from the Department of Energy and Climate Change today. The renewable heat incentive (RHI) for domestic properties has come into effect on 9 April 2014. This subsidy makes solar thermal and biomass (wood pellet) burners financially attractive alternatives to fossil fuels for home heating. The scheme is open to social and private landlords, their tenants and home owners.
BHESCo is a community energy supplier helping people lower their energy bills by installing renewable energy generation systems and energy efficiency measures. Contact us if you are interested in our risk free service offering for the Brighton & Hove community.
28 Jan 2014
Brace yourself, there’s another £17 billion in national spending cuts predicted for this year.
Half of the cuts will be to benefits, like the National Health Service. This government has been relentless in pursuing its agenda of protecting their ideology at the cost of poor and vulnerable people, especially the elderly. The Treasury introduced a budget that reduced corporate taxes, increased the personal allowance, costing the Treasury millions while cutting back benefits to offset the impact of their ideology on our national debt. Our deficit has reached a serious state of concern, now ballooning to £1.2 trillion, three quarters of the size of the UK economy. This might help to explain why fracking is so alluring to the people who control our energy policy – we need a source of income to boost the UK economy.
The clean tech industry is consistently the fastest growing sector in the world. Insufficient investment and policy turnarounds have badly impacted the UK’s low carbon industry, culminating in an attack on vulnerable people by stopping the Energy Company Obligation in March 2014. Our Energy Policy has been broken for many years. It’s time to start fixing it.
People with lesser means are still being fleeced by the Big Six energy suppliers. Six million households in the UK are on key meters. Five million households are in debt to their energy supplier, meaning that they are held captive and cannot switch. Studies conducted by BHESCo in Brighton & Hove, have determined that people pay 20 – 40% more for their electricity and gas on prepayment or “key“ meters. In winter, this means that people with key meters may run out of heat or electricity and not have the money to get the heating or lights turned back on. Increasing more people across the city must make a decision whether to heat or eat. Last year, 31,000 people died in the UK from the cold. According to Age UK, 90% of these deaths were in people over 65 years old. For the state not to provide for our elderly and vulnerable people is a lamentable turn of events. Considering the progress we’ve made in technology, our social services are evolving to Dickensian conditions.
67% of the British population would like the failed privatisation of 1993 reversed, to re-nationalise the energy industry. Unfortunately, this is more a dream, disappointingly, a likely impossibility. With a combined value well into the 100s of billions of pounds, the cost to the Treasury of reacquiring the energy suppliers and national grid would be too great to inspire political will. We can also assume that since taxpayer funds have been spent on bailing out the banks, we do not have the economic capacity to buy back national assets we once owned.
Yesterday, the Department of Energy and Climate change released their Community Energy Strategy. This report pledged support for community energy groups across the country. BHESCo will continue to work with Brighton & Hove City Council to drive down the cost of energy locally, investing in the local community. We expect that any support that we receive will create value for money for the taxpayer, delivering a low cost transition to a low carbon economy for less investment per kWh of energy generated or saved.
That is why Co-operative energy groups are so important. Groups managed by social entrepreneurs are picking up gauntlet to remedy a failed energy industry. 20 years experience has been enough time for us to recognise that the model didn’t work and its time to consider attractive alternatives. Show your support for community energy by joining BHESCo. Call us or write to us. Get in touch, we are here to help.
06 Dec 2013
The autumn statement was released with grand plans for reducing our energy bills by transferring the energy company’s obligation (ECO) to the taxpayer. Energy companies have succeeded in lowering their liability to finance the cost of providing insulation, new boilers and draught-proofing for struggling families and vulnerable people in communities across the country.
The question is whether this important support for the fuel poor and vulnerable people now considered to be too expensive will be reduced. Last year, 30,000 people died from winter cold related illness, one of the highest levels in Europe. Taxpayers will be financing shale gas extraction (fracking) that will be offset by less support for solar generated electricity and onshore wind. The net result is not beneficial to the taxpayer, nor to the energy consumer, creating less value for money from an economic standpoint.
The claim is that too much of the energy cost is spent on environmental measures. In fact all environmental charges comprise 9% of the average household energy bill of £1,350. These charges are for various services, including support for renewable energy and energy efficiency. Energy companies do not have a track record of success in rolling out programmes like the ECO on a government mandate. ECO replaced CERT and CESP, which were not considered successful programmes because the energy suppliers didn’t meet the government’s targets. Lots of money has been poured into ECO with little result. It’s just counterintuitive that a company whose obligation is to maximize profits for their shareholders is going to invest its resources in lowering its sales volumes by proactively investing in energy savings.
The taxpayer will not benefit from investments in shale gas extraction, for which many professionals predict will not bring down energy prices. We must focus our attention on making the infrastructural investments in the distribution network, including battery storage, and in distributed low cost generation like solar electricity and onshore wind bringing longer term value to our communities.